Suchergebnisse
Filter
6 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Stanley E. Kerr, The Lions of Marash: Personal Experiences with American Near East Relief, 1919–1922. Introduction by Richard G. Hovannisian (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1973). Pp. 318
In: International journal of Middle East studies: IJMES, Band 11, Heft 1, S. 126-127
ISSN: 1471-6380
A Bicentennial Reassessment of American‐Middle Eastern Relations
In: The Australian journal of politics and history: AJPH, Band 24, Heft 2, S. 174-183
ISSN: 1467-8497
RooseveIt's Quarantine Speech, The Georgia Press‐ and the Borg Thesis: A Note
In: The Australian journal of politics and history: AJPH, Band 21, Heft 2, S. 95-98
ISSN: 1467-8497
Admiral Mark L. Bristol, an Open-Door Diplomat in Turkey
In: International journal of Middle East studies: IJMES, Band 5, Heft 4, S. 450-467
ISSN: 1471-6380
United States diplomatic historians have traditionally claimed that American foreign-policy makers employed the Open-Door principle in the Middle East after World War I merely to defend American rights from the Allied efforts to achieve economic hegemony over Turkey and other parts of the old Ottoman Empire. However, William Appleman Williams — supported by the works of several younger scholars — has asserted that Woodrow Wilson used the, Open Door to promote American economic expansion. Williams maintains that the Open Door was not anad hocpolicy, fashioned simply to meet the immediate postwar challenge of the Allies — as the traditional historians have alleged. Nor was it British-inspired, idealistic policy that received only sporadic support during the twentieth century, as George F. Kennan has asserted. According to Williams, the Open Door was an American-designed tactic that diplomats used continuously throughout the first half of the twentieth century for the express purpose of promoting American expansion, with a view to creating an American economic empire, a process that resulted in the extension of American political and economic influence.